Home » RIGHT ON » Currently Reading:

Lesbians and IVF: redressing the balance

July 24, 2009 RIGHT ON 2 Comments

by Death by Chocolate

Many newspapers this week reported that a lesbian couple has won the right to IVF treatment on the NHS.  As several writers exclaimed in their headlines, this was “At Taxpayers Expense!”  Goodness, NHS treatments at the expense of taxpayers?  Groundbreaking stuff!  The outrage said writers experienced at this state of affairs must surely be to blame for their failure to place the requisite apostrophe after ‘Taxpayers’.  But I digress. 

GD3984330@Water-Babies---pics-s-1824

The decision of the trust is not the first of its kind.  As was widely reported in February, the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde reversed its initial denial of IVF treatment to a lesbian couple after the women commenced judicial review proceedings against them.  Both of these recent decisions are in anticipation of a change in the law that will, from October 2009, significantly reduce the hurdles faced by lesbians seeking IVF treatment on the NHS.  The choice as to whether to fund such treatment will still lie with individual health trusts.  However, under the previous Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, a trust could deny lesbian couples treatment by reference to a child’s “need for a father”.  As of October, couples will instead be required to demonstrate that they can offer “supportive parenting” – clearly a little less insurmountable for those all-female wannabe parental units out there.

Response to the changes has been predictably mixed.  One well known publication referred to the fact that only 27% of NHS trusts offer heterosexual couples the recommended three cycles of IVF treatment, whilst same sex couples are described as having been awarded “new rights” under the amended legislation.  This is a rather misleading position to take.  Whilst it is correct to state that the rights of lesbians stand to be improved under the revised Act, this will not put them in a more advantageous position than their heterosexual counterparts.  It will simply mean that they start on an equal footing.  Anything other than ‘equal’ is unjustifiable, and that is not just my personal opinion, but one that this country has enshrined legally by virtue of the key pieces of human rights and equality legislation we have enacted over the years.

Finally, for those of you considering creating your own little bundle of joy, Stonewall recently published a very helpful ‘idiot’s guide’ which you can access here.  Happy reading.

Currently there are "2 comments" on this Article:

  1. Lemon Tart says:

    Well said Death by Chocolate. No doubt the Daily Mail will manage to find 50+ ways to criticise this progress, but hopefully an increasing number of middle Englanders will start to see this is a fantastic jump forward. This makes me happy, in an Obama kind of way.

  2. Petit Fours says:

    that’s interesting. i didn’t know that lesbians could get IVF, it should be equal with straight couples. Given that the number of lesbian couples is much smaller than straight women, it’s not exactly going to disrupt the NHS either.

Comment on this Article:







TMC ON FACEBOOK: LIKE US PLZ!


Recent Comments

  • EatYourGreen: 8) is too funny 2) makes me slightly...
  • .: "ORAL SEX BETWEEN WOMEN isn’t the obviou...
  • em: please, thats Boris in a wig....
  • Frida: Help me cakes! Will I just turn up at Re...
  • Kat: Number 3 from your last review was answe...
  • Jez: Hmmm...I nervously anticipate this artic...
  • BeauParleur: Really awkward when Sam stormed round an...
  • Haza: Agree with Sara although I think the fuc...
  • Devils Food Cake: I LOVE HIM. AND THIS....
  • Max: Being directly guilty for one of the (le...

CAKE TAGS

Events Calendar

CONTACT US